Saturday, October 22, 2016

Trials & Tribulations of Policy Analysis Construction


 Image result for david wagner portland maine

    It seems a little strange to blog in reflection of a piece of writing, but I had a really interesting learning experience co-composing the policy analysis with Chelsea, and I wanted to share some of the “behind the scenes” with you. (Sorry, Chelsea, you have heard this all before!)
    As a refresher, Chelsea and I are studying the issue of homeless occupants of public space in Portland. We had the benefit of meeting with Ethan (of the Parks and Recreation Department) in class, and since then, have STRUGGLED to reconnect with him. We forged ahead regardless, realizing, that at least for this section of our analysis, we were mostly building our (and our reader’s) background knowledge about homelessness in Portland, and what historical events and policies have helped set the stage for the current crisis.
    I learned quickly that assembling this history was going to be WAY more challenging than I anticipated… particularly as someone new to this state. I wasn’t sure what policies or events to look at - I was searching for history that I didn’t have the language to describe. News reports aren’t readily available, journals didn’t seems to have the historical content I was searching for, and book sources by and large did not focus the homeless population of the city. Making matters trickier, policy changes that impact the homeless population usually don’t ‘sound’ like housing policies. For example, using the 2015 example of Lepage's refusal to expand Medicare/Medicaid coverage - as social workers, we are aware of the profound impact this had on the homeless population - however on the surface level, this was a decision about insurance coverage - NOT homelessness or homeless people in public space.
    I realized quickly that to get an accurate description of Maine’s history, I couldn’t rely on  print sources alone, I would need to get more creative - seeking professionals in the community who have some expertise in this area.
    I was fortunate enough to connect (remotely) with David Wagner, our former professor, and Rob Parritt (the director of the Oxford Street Shelter). Professor Wagner validated my research struggle by informing me that in a city of this size, social history is often shared orally, and it would be highly unlikely to find documentation of the sort I was looking. The history of hidden populations is stored in the minds of the remaining few, and gradually, with the help of community members, I was able to bring together pieces of Portland’s underground history. Hearing the history from the viewpoints of different stakeholders (from grassroots to bureaucratic levels) too, helped contextualize my understanding.
Image result for robert parritt oxford st shelter    The process was more time consuming and gratifying than I expected, and I am excited to share my learning with our class. I learned to reach outside my usual researching procedure and rely on spoken word and lived experience as a springboard for building background and understanding the trajectory of the city. I felt a certain level of  privilege as a student, being able to access the expertise of community members who were willing to volunteer some of their time to teach me. 
    Similar to Portland's history, Chelsea and I are realizing that our policy analysis to address homeless people using Portland's public spaces is sounding less and less like a housing policy... stay tuned!

Wednesday, October 5, 2016

"Either I Close My Eyes Or I Don't" - Calais Jungle

In light of the policy analysis that Chelsea and I are working on, consciously and unconsciously, I have been following news stories covering homelessness in Portland. Last week, in class, we talked about the Portland Press Herald’s coverage of Arianna’s family and their journey from Tent City to an apartment in Lewiston (Billings, 2016). Throughout the semester, we've discussed policies that impact where homeless people are permitted to inhabit, and the social justice (or lack of) that comes from leveling tent structures.

My eyes have been peeled for publications of this nature, and I've become totally mesmerized by what is occurring in France, specifically Calais, and the connection between our community policy battles (despite our smaller scale).

The once small migrant camp has grown exponentially, and “houses” upwards of 7,000 individuals (Nossiter & Hicks, 2016).

There have been TONS of publications about this, however, about a week ago, the New York Times published a heavily photographed  article that to me, captured the humanity of the crisis (Nossiter & Hicks, 2016). (I'm inserting a few of those photos here, and the link for further reading - absolutely worth it for those that missed this: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/27/world/europe/calais-jungle-france-migrants.html?mwrsm=Email&_r=0).




The magnitude of the refugee crisis in Europe is striking. However, there are related themes between the European refugee crisis and the housing battle in Portland: How to handle vulnerable populations as they seek stabilization on public lands? What policies will support human beings and the communities in which they live?

No one has an answer.

France has actually physically assembled a barbed wire wall around “the jungle” with the intent of preventing people from passing into Britain. Given land quality, over time, the wall’s structure will deteriorate. The measure is a far cry from preventing imminent migration to Britain, or providing any semblance of stability to the adults and unaccompanied minors inhabiting the tent city (Nossiter & Hicks, 2016).

Eradicating the camps has become a hot issue in France’s elections - yet accommodating human beings has not. Mayors in France have even created policies that prevent migrants from entering their towns and cities (Nossiter & Hicks, 2016). The hazing and shut out aren't unlike the experience of homeless folks in Maine (like Arianna’s family) who are shut out of housing opportunities due to stigma and prejudgement.



Despite the depressing and quite honestly embarrassing response in social justice and policy to this reality, there are reports of “guerilla social workers” taking grassroots action in support of migrants.

In an almost “Underground Railroad” fashion, a French Farmer has taken it upon himself to help transport and navigate 200+ being via train into Britain. When asked about his work, he states, “I don’t have a global solution, he said at another point. “But the state is not managing this properly. I think it’s my duty. And I don’t think it’s normal that children have to go through this…. Either I close my eyes, or I don’t,” he said. “These are people with no papers at all. That means they have no protection. I don’t see how we can be inert” (Nossiter, 2016).

The case of Calais is an extremity, but his statement applies to those who are homeless and marginalized everywhere. Either we close our eyes or we don't. No giant solution exists for the messiness of the current housing policy crisis.

We are arriving in a place where we need to open our eyes to suffering around us and accept one another - regardless of  living conditions. We have to stop pushing “undesirable” populations into further suffering.

References:

Billings, R. (2016). Meet arianna, the little girl who lived in portland’s woods. Portland Press Herald. Retrieved from: http://www.pressherald.com/2016/09/25/ariannas-home/

Nossiter, A., & Hicks, T. (2016). Inside france’s ‘jungle’: Desperate migrants keep coming to calais. New York Times. Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/27/world/europe/calais-jungle-france-migrants.html?mwrsm=Email&_r=0.

Nossiter, A. (2016). A french underground railroad, moving african migrants. New York Times. Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/05/world/europe/france-italy-migrants-smuggling.html